IELTS Writing Task 2 — Teacher Feedback

Nowadays, English is become used as the main language of education system in many non-English speaking countries. While some people argue that this trend can improve social communication and crate job opportunities, I believe it is negatives outweigh the benefits due to high learning cost and the loss of cultural.

On the one hand, it is arguable that learning English in school brings several benefits. Firstly, it helps students communicate more easily with people around the world. When a person master a global language, they can make international friends, share knowledge and take part in social discussion without difficult and challenge. Secondly, having a fluent English accent can improve job opportunities. For example, most international companies prefer recruiting employees who can speak English fluently. Consequently, students who are taught in English can find a jobs with higher salaries and better change to work abroad in the future.

On the other hand, I believe the negative of this change more serious. The main issue is the high cost of education. For instance, this is because the students future job and high-quality life, schools need to use a lot of money to hire quality teachers, update learning facilities and buy excessive of foreign books. As a result, new facilities are very expensive, meaning poor families cannot afford this education, which creates bigger gap knowledge and future change. In addition, prioritizing English can lead to the loss of local culture. When student spend most of their study time in a foreign language, they will pay less attention to their mother tongue and traditions. During that time, this will make young people slowly lose connection with cultural roots.

In conclusion, while using English as the main language in education helps with communication and job changes, I agree that it is a negative trend because of the heavy financial burden on families and the loss of traditional cultural.

Nowadays, English is increasingly used as the main language of instruction in the education systems of many non-English-speaking countries. While this trend can improve international communication and career prospects, I believe its disadvantages outweigh its benefits because English-medium education can create financial barriers and weaken local languages and cultures.

On the one hand, using English as the language of instruction can offer students several advantages. First, regular exposure to a global language can make it easier for them to communicate with people from other countries, exchange knowledge and participate in international academic discussions. Second, strong English skills can improve future employment prospects. Many multinational companies value employees who can communicate confidently in English, so students educated through English may have better access to higher-paying jobs and opportunities to work abroad.

On the other hand, I consider the disadvantages more significant. The first concern is cost. Schools that switch to English-medium education may need to recruit or train teachers who can teach subjects effectively in English and purchase suitable English-language materials. These expenses can place pressure on schools and families, and students from lower-income backgrounds may have less access to high-quality programmes, widening educational inequality. In addition, giving English priority in school can weaken local linguistic and cultural traditions. If students spend most of their academic time using English, they may have fewer opportunities to develop advanced literacy in their mother tongue or engage deeply with local literature and traditions. Over time, this can reduce their connection with their cultural roots.

In conclusion, although English-medium education can support international communication and employment, I view it as a negative development overall when it increases educational inequality and displaces local languages and cultural traditions.